Tiffiny
Tiffiny
Minneapolis, MN
Female
Single

Cutting calories may extend life, health. Does this mean I’ll live to see 100?

Posted: 7/24/2009 at 03:10 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

In the news last week, I came across a news story that may highlight the one positive note (other than the rock star parking) of having a spinal cord injury. Scientists at UW Madison announced they’ve discovered that primates (Rhesus monkeys to be exact), who’s daily calorie intake was cut by nearly a 1/3, not only lived longer (because scientists have long known this), but experienced 24% less occurrence of disease.

Pretty awesome, right? It is if you don’t like eating.

But here’s the awesome thing about this study. When you have a spinal cord injury, doctors recommend you restrict your caloric intake to prevent weight gain (since we’re not walking). For quadriplegics, they recommend you take about 500-600 calories off your daily calorie intake (depending on how active you are). And I’ve been sticking to this calorie intake method for 16 years (!!)

Does that mean I shall live to be a centurion, UW scientists? Most quads you know, don’t follow their diets, and sadly tend to die in their 50s and 60s. Do I have a shot at proving this statistic wrong because I‘m actually a good girl (or am I cursing myself by actually typing this out?)?

Oh, and for everyone out there wondering, if you do the math, a 1/3 of the calories removed from a 2,000 calories a day is 1300. Think you could do it??

In conclusion, this is great news for me, and I really hope the anorexics of the world aren’t secretly cheering “we told you so!” right now :/

- Weight gain and disability, on Disaboom

- One amputee resdiscovers her body through yoga, on Disaboom

- Staying fit after 50 (tips), on Disaboom

904 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • rai wrote on Jul 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM
    correct me if i'm wrong but i think 1300 is actually a little under 2/3's of 2000 and around 666 is 1/3 of 2000 . Interesting blog and i can see why they say that.
  • Tiffiny wrote on Jul 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM
    thx rai! i think you're right. math and i aren't friends :) either way, it's a lot!
  • Rai wrote on Jul 29, 2009 at 1:44 PM
    Oh, no problem. Math and i aren't on the best of terms either so i get whatcha meant :)