Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Teacher Who Let Students "Vote Out" 5-Year-Old Boy with Asperger's Syndrome Gets Her Job Back

Posted: 6/11/2009 at 05:20 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Alex BartonWendy Portillo, the Kindergarten teacher infamous for permitting neurotypical students to vote a boy with a form of Autism out of her class, will keep both her contract with the St. Lucie County school district and her tenured status after a unanimous vote by the School Board. Portillo is "overjoyed" by the ruling and hopes to return to teaching.

 

[Update: Alex's family wasn't notified of the hearing to reinstate Portillo.]

 

In May of 2008, Ms. Portillo led her students in a reality TV-like exercise in which Alex Barton, then 5 years old, was made to stand in front of the class while classmates listed reasons they didn't like him. Classmates called Alex "disgusting" and "annoying," among other things. Then, the class took a vote and by a margin of 14 to 2 chose to exclude Alex from class. He was made to leave the Kindergarten classroom and spent the rest of the day in the school nurse's office.

 

Alex Barton reportedly has not returned to school since the incident. Shortly after Alex was voted out of class, his mother said he was so traumatized that he was unable to even ride past his former elementary school in a car without screaming and begging not to be forced to return to school.

 

Alex Barton holding an adult's handThirteen individuals testified before the School Board in favor of permitting Wendy Portillo to return to teaching. These supporters included Portillo's sons, former colleagues at Morningside Elementary School, and parents whose children had been students of Portillo during her 12 year teaching career. No one appeared at the hearing to give the Barton family's side of the story.

 

Portillo must still serve out the remainder of a one-year unpaid suspension ordered as a result of the case.

 

What do you think? Was the School Board right to allow Portillo to return to teaching?

44,318 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • afo49guy wrote on Jun 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM
    The Fuhrer might be dead,but his adherents clearly are alive , well and still kicking the life out of people they have defined as subhuman or as life unworthy of living.Heil Scheisskopferin Portillo und ihre kleine STORMTROOPERS!Der Fuhrer will be very proud. ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING!!!!!! ollie
  • Sara wrote on Jun 11, 2009 at 9:00 PM
    THIS IS SO WRONG. What an ignorant idiot! That poor little boy! This woman needs to be forced to take some child psychology classes! Autism or not, children should NOT be treated like this by adults!
  • Bonnie wrote on Jun 11, 2009 at 9:51 PM
    As the parent of a child with Asperger's Syndrome and a teacher, I find this ruing completely unacceptable. I have fought long and hard for my son to be recognized as a person, and treated properly by not only other students, but by teachers as well. This teacher should be treated the same way she treated this poor child. He has no control over his autism. I can't believe she could be so heartless and call herself a teacher!
  • Robert wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 2:55 AM
    She should be stripped of her teaching license, and banned from teaching again.
  • lila wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 2:56 AM
    no, this woman should not be allowed to teach or pass on her warped views onto children. cannot believe the board allowed her to return. and her sons were on the board? incredible bias. disgusting behavious by the entire school.
  • anon wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 4:15 AM
    Well, what she did sounds indeed wrong, but it also appears a sentence was given to her (one year of unpaid suspension). In normal society, once you have served your sentence, your slate is clean, and the school can resume her contract. Assuming she is not somehow mentally retarded, like the boy, so she can't undertake her profession correctly.
  • Liz wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 5:44 AM
    @anon: "Assuming she is not somehow mentally retarded, like the boy, so she can't undertake her profession correctly." Do you know what it takes to be classified as retarded? How about the criterion for an Asperger's diagnosis? Did you know that Bill Gates and Al Gore have Asperger's? The story did not say anything about the boy's intelligence, just that he had Asperger's. You should probably stop assuming that just because someone has a developmental disability that they are retarded. Most of the time they aren't.
  • anon wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 5:49 AM
    @anon (nice name btw): Your statement is ridiculous. Just because she served her sentence doesn't mean she should resume normal life. Ostracizing a mentally disabled child and turning him into the class pariah isn't a sign of a good or even halfway decent teacher or authority figure. Imagine if your boss did this sort of thing to you, should he simply be suspended and then allowed to oversee you again? This sort of behavior should be grouped in with sexual assault. It will scar a child for life, having to go through this. In my opinion, she shouldn't be near any impressionable young children.
  • Doug wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 6:28 AM
    She should not teach. What did the rest of her class learn that day? They learned that it was ok to taint the education process of a young innocent child by publicly ostracizing him. They learned that it was ok to deliver a verbal assault to the boy because he was "different". They did not learn one thing that day, tolerance. After this decision by the school board, they have learned one more thing. There is no justice.
  • Matt Moon wrote on Jun 12, 2009 at 7:08 AM
    Oh. I thought soul-crushing public humiliation due to your differences was what school's all about.