Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Massachusetts Bill Would Rule People Over 60 and Some People with Disabilities Incapable of Consenting to Erotic Photography

Posted: 5/1/2009 at 06:17 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Senior CitizenDo age and certain disabilities make a person incapable of consenting to be the subject of erotic photography? That question will be put to the Massachusetts state House with Massachusetts House Bill 1668, a proposed amendment to the state's child pornography law that would make it a serious crime to photograph with "lascivious intent" a person over the age of 60 or a person with a disability who has been declared mentally incompetent.

 

State Representative Kathi-Anne Reinstein says the bill she sponsored was intended to protect vulnerable populations from sexual predators, but some disability advocates and law buffs have criticized the amendments as restricting the sexual freedom of seniors and people with disabilities.

 

If Mass. HB 1668 is passed, a person violating the new provisions of the law would receive a mandatory minimum sentence of at least ten years in prison or a fine of at least $10,000. This would include spouses photographing one another with "lascivious intent."

 

Some observers have noted that the specification "declared mentally incompetent" appears only in one portion of the proposal. Says law professor Eugene Volokh, "The law is not limited to people who are mentally handicapped and thus unable to consent, or who are photographed against their will by their caretakers (the justification discussed in this story). The operative provisions cover people over 60 and the disabled whether or not they are incompetent. One provision, relating to people's being "deemed incapable of consenting," would cover only "an elder or a person with a disability adjudicated as incompetent by a court of the commonwealth," but I don't see how this would stop liability under the other provisions, since consent is no defense under the other provisions in any event."

 

What do you think? Would this bill protect senior citizens and people with disabilities from sexual predators, or does it criminalize normal human sexual behavior?

 

Related: Woman Determined to Help Son with Down Syndrome Find a Lover

6,548 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Dave E wrote on May 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM
    Maybe I've been away from New England for too long, but how is being over 60 years of age a disability? And how does that condition by itself make people incapable of being sexual? Was this law proposed by a twenty-something who just overheard their parents talking about sex?
  • myReport » Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent wrote on May 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM
    Pingback from myReport » Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent
  • Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent | Geek News and Musings wrote on May 4, 2009 at 3:00 PM
    Pingback from Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent | Geek News and Musings
  • news.affigold.info » Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent wrote on May 4, 2009 at 3:09 PM
    Pingback from news.affigold.info » Massachusetts wants to imprison people for 10 years if they take a nude photo of their over-60 spouse, even with spouse’s consent
  • Zachariah Delventhal wrote on May 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM
    This is a horrible horrible bill. I can't begin to describe how terrified I am of the PC police taking over our right to free speech, and this is example one. If they have the gaul to pass this bill into law I can only hope that the Massachusetts courts send it back the way it came.
  • No, no, NO, grandma! They want to make it illegal. - Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com wrote on May 5, 2009 at 4:47 AM
    Pingback from No, no, NO, grandma! They want to make it illegal. - Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com
  • Bill Billson wrote on May 5, 2009 at 11:29 AM
    I agree that no one wants to see that... but the goverment should not regulate it.
  • Jim Moore wrote on May 5, 2009 at 5:57 PM
    Is she suggesting 60 year olds are incompetent?? Is she judging by herself?? this is monstrous silliness. most sixty year olds are hale, hearty, and have ALL their faculties! For heaven sakes, GO FIND A REAL PROBLEM!! (I thought Georgia had all the loons!)
  • Jim Moore wrote on May 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM
    Is she suggesting 60 year olds are incompetent?? Is she judging by herself?? this is monstrous silliness. most sixty year olds are hale, hearty, and have ALL their faculties! For heaven sakes, GO FIND A REAL PROBLEM!! (I thought Georgia had all the loons!)
  • morganstanfield wrote on May 6, 2009 at 10:20 AM
    This is ridiculous and offensive. When did being an elder make a person incompetent or incapable of autonomous eroticism across the scale of healthy behaviors? I look forward to being like my 66-year-old mom and her 62-year-old fiance'--powerful, highly sexually active, and entirely without patience for guff like this.