Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Day Program for Adults with Disabilities Built on Superfund Cleanup Site

Posted: 12/26/2008 at 05:55 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Sign outside day program identifies it as a voluntary cleanup site.A taxpayer-funded day program providing job training to adults with disabilities is located on a Superfund hazardous cleanup site, where day care centers, private residences, and hospitals are legally banned, according to a report by the Greenville News. Even raising livestock is prohibited on the nearly 20-acre South Carolina property.

 

$200,000 of state taxpayer money was paid to the Charles Lea Center toward the purchase of the $868,000 property last year, and the job training program now conducted on the site costs taxpayers $1.7 million annually.

 

David Kiely, the center's executive director, said the "minor spillage of some chemicals" on site before the purchase has been cleaned up and there is "no danger" to about 200 people with disabilities who now receive industrial worker training in the state-funded WorkAbility program.

 

South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford expressed concern about the safety of the center through a spokesman, Joel Sawyer, who said in part, "This is not the kind of gray zone that you should be operating in, particularly when you're dealing with some of our most vulnerable citizens."

 

The state Department of Health and Environmental control will continue to investigate the degree of groundwater contamination on the property, which is located off the Asheville Highway. It is unclear when any cleanup work could be performed.

 

What do you think? Did the Charles Lea Center get a deal on 20 acres of prime real estate, or are people with disabilities being exposed to hazardous waste against their will as a result of the center's purchase? Should adult day programs be permitted where schools and farming are legally prohibited?

 

Related: Woman with Disabilities Dies Following Starvation in Group Home, Weighing Only 48 Pounds

1,320 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Disabled Politico wrote on Feb 12, 2009 at 6:42 PM
    An Iowa company that employed men with developmental disabilities has admitted to paying the men only
  • Nan wrote on Feb 18, 2009 at 3:07 AM
    No livestock, but ok for the disabled? Why isn't there a "PETD" (people for the ethical treatment of the disabled). Really, it sounds like our city, which refused to use an old trucking company building (very serviceable) for a fire station on the grounds that it might be contaminated, but then they turned around and allowed businesses to go in the same building.
  • Nan wrote on Feb 18, 2009 at 3:08 AM
    No livestock, but ok for the disabled? Why isn't there a "PETD" (people for the ethical treatment of the disabled). Really, it sounds like our city, which refused to use an old trucking company building (very serviceable) for a fire station on the grounds that it might be contaminated, but then they turned around and allowed businesses to go in the same building.