Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Oregon Patients Denied Chemo, Offered Assisted Suicide

Posted: 8/14/2008 at 06:29 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Barbara Wagner with her dachshundWhen Barbara Wagner's lung cancer returned, the Oregon woman was prescribed a chemotherapy drug, Tarceva, that could lengthen her life and provide comfort. Then, she was notified that the Oregon Health Plan wouldn't cover the cancer drug, but would cover palliative (comfort) care, including a doctor-assisted suicide.

 

“Treatment of advanced cancer that is meant to prolong life, or change the course of this disease, is not a covered benefit of the Oregon Health Plan,” said the unsigned letter Wagner received from LIPA, the Eugene company that administers the Oregon Health Plan in Lane County.

 

Ms. Wagner isn't the first Oregon cancer patient to be offered a doctor-assisted suicide in place of treatment. Randy Stroup, who has prostate cancer, applied to the Oregon Health Plan for assistance and was told the Plan wouldn't cover chemo, but would cover a physician-assisted suicide. Randy fought back by appealing the Plan's decision and won. His chemotherapy is now being covered, and he hopes to gain more time with his five grandchildren than he would have had without chemo.

 

For Barbara Wagner, too, there is something of a happy ending: The pharmaceutical company making Tarceva agreed to donate a year's supply of the expensive drug, and to consider providing further medication free of charge if she is still living and wishes to continue taking Tarceva in a year's time.

 

However, for other patients with advanced cancer, there may be few options. The Oregon Health Plan will not cover chemotherapy unless there is a better than 5% chance it will help patients live for five more years. Patients who don't meet that standard get a letter denying coverage for chemo and suggesting comfort care, including pain relief and, potentially, doctor assisted suicide.

11,743 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Greed Sucks » Blog Archive » I thought I over reacted when I moved here. wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 4:24 PM
    Pingback from Greed Sucks » Blog Archive » I thought I over reacted when I moved here.
  • Jim McDish wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 5:15 PM
    Sadlly, with the greedy somebag (always have their hands out) insurance companies it is now all about PROFIT. Nothing else matters. JT www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
  • Word Soup wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 6:01 PM
    I wondered when the mercilessly efficient HMO industry would start embracing euthanasia as a "cost efficient alternative" to giving a flying fuck and helping their patients fight cancer. Apparently Oregon Health Plan has made the leap:"When Barbara Wagner
  • ORResident wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 7:27 PM
    It seems from the comments that there might be some lack of clarity on what the Oregon Health Plan is. It was not conceived as an HMO or a private corporation. It is primarily a state program for providing healthcare to low-income Oregonians. The state expanded health care benefits to more people by rationing health care. There's a prioritized list. They cover procedures up to a certain line. In 2006, that was through 530 of 710 conditions. Cosmetic procedures, things that respond to home treatment or are resolved on their own, and "conditions for which treatment is generally ineffective." I've been told that there are some similarities to British health care - where expensive chemotherapy drugs may not be covered if they extend life for only a few more months. There are trade-offs. I am a public school teacher in the poorest district in Portland. A large percentage of my students are enrolled in the plan and get preventative and routine medical care. In the first year of the plan, approximately 100,000 more Oregonians were eligible for health care compared to the 250,000 who qualified under Medicaid the previous year. I'm not expressing an opinion either way about what should be covered and who should be covered. Unfortunately we don't collect enough revenue in this state and country to adequately fund public services - especially when we provide tax-breaks to the richest Americans and spend resources to fight multiple wars. In Oregon, voters repeatedly have voted for ballot measures that have decreased state revenue. When the infamous Ballot Measure 5 passed in 1990, Governor Barbara Roberts warned us that people would die as a result of this. State services (police, health, social services, schools) have been dealing with the consequences for years. I wish Barbara Wagner the best and I hope that, as a society, we are able to do something to fix the healthcare crisis.
  • Bobbi Illing wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 7:55 PM
    Perfect. Just what we need, the state telling us its time to die. What next? I just spent a year fighting, and I might add winning, with breast cancer. Our entire insurance needs to be overhauled, its become a system thats preditory. Remembering where the insurance companys make their money, its no wonder we are all in a mess. If we get healed, from whatever life brings, it will be no thanks to the insurance companys that we have allowed to exist. We should all be ashamed of ourself. Two things this country needs...a new health care system and a new school system. And less war. Bobbi
  • Oregon patients denied chemo, but guess what insurance will cover! : Not Before Coffee wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 8:09 PM
    Pingback from Oregon patients denied chemo, but guess what insurance will cover! : Not Before Coffee
  • Shane wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 9:00 PM
    I'm not sure I see a problem here. Since this is a program for low income folks, doesn't it make more sense to spend the money on people who will live, rather then spending it on people who have a less then 5% change of living 5 months or more?
  • Cynthia wrote on Aug 15, 2008 at 9:17 PM
    If you have any real understanding of medicine, health, and healing, you would realize that chemotherapy drugs are effectively doctor-assisted suicide. Oregon is not DEPRIVING anyone by not paying for chemo.
  • ORResident wrote on Aug 16, 2008 at 5:22 AM
    I don't think the state is telling her to die. There is a more complete story in the Eugene Register-Guard about her case. It would be great if there were funds for all the drugs one might need. I would vote for increasing my income tax rate to pay for better coverage for all. But, this is the current system. There are different options for palliative care. For some, doctor-assisted suicide might be appropriate. For others, it would not. The patient does get to choose whether or not they will exercise this option. Maybe the presentation of this option was insensitive for this patient, but for others, Death With Dignity is compassionate care. Oregon's Death With Dignity Act is not something that the state has foisted on us - unless, of course, state means the registered voters who collected signatures to place this on the ballot, the 51% of voters who approved the ballot measure, and the 60% of voters who rejected a referendum by our state legislature to repeal the law. I'm totally in agreement that we need to overhaul the health care system in this country, but I see doctor-assisted suicide as an appropriate, compassionate option for some patients in our state.
  • Alexa wrote on Aug 16, 2008 at 5:58 PM
    I posted a bit back here about my feelings on assisted suicide. Basically, I said that while I do think