I didn’t support
Barack Obama from the beginning of this
race.
Early on, I had believed
Bill
Richardson or
Dennis Kucinich had the policy stances I agreed with most closely
(i.e. far left wing) and that
John Edwards had the good looks and demographic
appeal to actually win the race, he reminded me of another a relatively
moderate, white male from the south who easily won elections to lead us in
peaceful, more economically stable times.
However, after seeing Obama’s victory speech after the Iowa caucus, I was drawn
to his sincere passion and message of unified progress. He may not have much in common will Bill, but
he sure seemed to mirror the style of Jack, an even more moving icon in the
history of progressive politics. Since
then, I have firmly been in Obama’s camp, following each contest closely and
practically using every moment that I am not working or sleeping to read news analysis
on the internet. Obama may be leading
the race by more than 100 delegates,
but he is still clearly the underdog. Despite what national poles say, if Clinton had won more
states on super Tuesday and swept 11 primaries/caucuses since, we would barely
remember Barack Obama’s name. Just the
fact that Hillary is still in the race shows how powerful Obama’s adversary for
the nomination is.
He has been accused of being all words and no
substance. Of course, this is an
accusation offered by those who probably envy his eloquence and his ability to
motivate and unify others with his speeches.
At the end of the day, all politics is is words. These are words that devide us in fear or
unite us around a common cause. They are
words that scare people into not trusting those who are different than they are
or bring hope for change and a better future.
That is, words build political will and political will is exactly what
we need if we are going to take this country in a new direction.
Setting this observation aside for a moment, it should also
be pointed out that Obama does have substance – i.e. specific policies and
plans he promises to promote as president to bring about change. I am not sure how anyone could doubt that
after watching the recent debates. But
if you do, I would like to point out one specific area in which Obama leaves
everyone else behind when it comes to detailed, thoughtful policy positions:
disability rights. If you check out the
websites of the “final four” contenders for the white house, you will notice
that Obama is the ONLY candidate that lists disability policy as a tab on the
issues section of his site. It is #2 on
the alphabetized list, taking its place as a PRIORITY, right along side of the
sexier, more widely noticed issues like the war in iraq, the economy, and
healthcare. His disabilities tab
includes a video blog (that is accessible to people who are Deaf/HH with captioning)
outlining specific policies he would pursue as president to help people with
disabilities. Specifically, he promises
to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and
support key legislation that will liberate people with disabilities and give
them a more full range of opportunities in where and how they can study, work,
and live (i.e. he gives his support strengthen or pass to IDEA, ADARA, and CCA). A detailed account of his policy plan is
available for download as a PDF.
So, the next time someone accuses Obama of being all talk
and no substance, ask them if they have heard of the Community Choice Act. If they say they haven’t, tell them how Obama
has and how he supports it and other specific and thoughtful policies that will
free our people!
Filed under: community, disability experience, activism, advocacy, disability rights, ableism, empowerment, liberation, civil rights, Independent Living movement, de-institutionalization, Presidential Primaries, Barack Obama, ADAPT, progressive politics, ADA Restoration Act, Community Choice Act, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act