Kara
Kara
Kentucky
Female
Married

Illusions of Inclusion

Posted: 10/5/2009 at 05:31 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Today's post is the first of several intended to contribute to Disability Awareness Month.

 

I have mixed feelings about the dedication of months or days to oppressed members of our society. It's frightening to think that the thought, dialogue, and work would stop when these time frames elapse. That's my theoretical side. My practical side supports any and all positive steps towards awareness.

 

In the last few decades, society has made some gradual progress in its treatment of people with disabilities. This can be seen in the adoption of civil rights laws to protect and empower people with disabilities. And there are plenty of real world examples of progress in the workplace as people with disabilities make valuable contributions to our world each and every day. I view the progression as stepping through tolerance, towards acceptance, and ultimately to the facilitation of inclusion.

 

Inclusion differs from other attempts to demonstrate equal treatment because it involves ACTION. The most brilliant lecture on the value of accepting people with disabilities or increasing diversity in the workforce doesn't achieve inclusion. It goes beyond the belief that inclusion is the right thing to do and involves the reality that inclusion takes work. Inclusion is often an ongoing process. It's more than hiring a person who uses a wheelchair. It's more than speaking to a friend with a learning disability about how they could join your study group.

 

[Graphic caption: Colorful illustration of people holding hands with text that reads Diversity and Inclusion: The Keys to Success]

 

I recently attended a seminar led by Neil Glickman. He's a psychologist who has dedicated his career to improving the mental health treatment options available to people who are Deaf or hard of hearing and have language and learning challenges. I learned a great deal and a particular phrase has stuck with me almost two weeks after the event. Dr. Glickman spoke on the trouble with "illusions of inclusion." The most common example, said Glickman, occurs when a hospital, a school, or a workplace hires a sign language interpreter and assumes that the mere presence of this interpreter means inclusion has been achieved. Sign language interpretation is tricky business! It's not word-for-word interpretation that might occur between people speaking two different verbal languages. Sign language interpretation involves careful translation between two different cultures. If an interpreter is provided, but no other efforts are made to include the person with a disability, inclusion is almost never achieved.

 

Illusions of inclusion involve the unseen barriers that keep people with disabilities from reaping the rewards of full access to physical and social situations. The fact that others believe inclusion is available is almost worse than the realization that it's not there at all. Illusions of inclusion in my life have involved appointment to a position with the unstated expectation that I first had to disprove doubts of others before I could start on equal ground with my able-bodied peers. Other illusions involve physically accessible professional networking groups where few people are able to comfortably talk with me. There are a number of illusions within personal relationships as well. People who fully accept aspects of your disability *except* the possibility that you would consider having children, adopting, or starting a family in other ways.

 

What are the illusions of inclusion in your life? I understand these are taboo topics that are hard to point out and even harder to talk about. If we don't start differentiating between successful acts of inclusion and the illusions of inclusion though, we'll never make those illusions realities.

 

Here are some thoughts shared by friends on Twitter to get your started:

 

 Jelena Woehr (@jelenawoehr) discussed the fear that as a woman, person of color, or person with a disability you might be the "token" person at that workplace. It's a "sidestep to inclusion," she said, "We're not discriminating. Look, That person works here!"

Tracy Hurlbert (@supercrip) also shared an example of an event that was held to raise money for an elevator that would improve accessibility of a hall. The event, however, was held IN the hall so people with disabilities were unable to attend!

What are the illusions of inclusion that you face?

 

[Graphic caption: The word INCLUSION is written above a circle with symbols representing different groups of people. Symbols representing men, women, and people with disabilities are shown.]

Related posts on Disaboom:

Two Milkshakes Please, Disability Discrimination at the Drive-Through Part I

Two Milkshakes Please, Disability Discrimination at the Drive-Through Part II

Employees with Disabilities have Hidden Talents

704 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Twitter Trackbacks for Illusions of Inclusion - Disaboom [disaboomlive.com] on Topsy.com wrote on Oct 5, 2009 at 5:16 PM
    Pingback from Twitter Trackbacks for Illusions of Inclusion - Disaboom [disaboomlive.com] on Topsy.com
  • APersonOnline wrote on Oct 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM
    The illusion being spread by every search engine online is that by presenting persons with disabilities through results such as news items and other results that present websites and so forth related to us, we are being, 'included,' in society. The fact is - these same search engines continue to produce results that also present people with disabilities in highly negative ways, as does Facebook and Twitter. Inclusiveness is only achieved when we are viewed as equals. If equality means that we are to be equally demeaned, then what is the point of attempts at inclusiveness? If I were to give you a dollar each and every day, yet call you an idiot as I did so, would the good of giving you a dollar mean anything?
  • Kara wrote on Oct 18, 2009 at 8:56 AM
    @APersonOnline: You make a really interesting point because there are also illusions of inclusion in the virtual (aka online world). Several years ago, I used to believe that EVERYTHING should be entirely inclusive. Since then, however, I've learned that there is an exceptional value to some exclusive programs-which are designed for or include only-or mostly-people with disabilities. Adapted sports programs and sites like Disaboom might be an example. Your mention that the media often represents us negatively is certainly a concern. Another worry is that at times they don't represent us at all (like in movies, sitcoms, commercials, etc.). Thanks for your comment-it got me thinking!