Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

St. Louis Abolishes Free Parking for Most People With Disabilities -- On Disability Advocate's Order

Posted: 6/8/2009 at 10:33 AM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Wheelchair parking symbol on cobblestonesIn St. Louis, Missouri, all drivers who use disabled parking placards get to park for free in metered parking spaces. On August 1st, this rule will change so that only people who are incapable of putting a coin in the meter can park without paying.

 

 

David J. Neuberger, new head of St. Louis' Office on the Disabled, is behind the change. He calls it a stride toward equality for people with disabilities. "People with disabilities have a right to a level playing field, but people with disabilities do not have a right to special favors," he says. Newburger -- himself a polio survivor who uses a wheelchair -- believes the current rules have spread beyond the intent of the law and allows people to game the system.

 

Many other people with disabilities disagree. In a city that allows people to park all day as long as they return to feed their parking meters every two hours, a person who works eight hours a day and parks in a metered spot will pay about $1500 on parking each year. Not having to feed the meter every two hours can mean the difference between maintaining employment and being too exhausted to work, argue many disability advocates, including Newburger's predecessor.

 

In addition to needing to obtain parking permits or license plates, city employees with disabilities will now need to prove their need for accessible reserved parking to Newburger. If a person has a "visually obvious" disability, he or she will be able to get a special space for the same fee other city employees pay ($60-$80, depending on the parking lot). If the person's disability is not visually obvious, he or she will have to be evaluated by a Washington University occupational therapist at the city's expense before buying a parking space.

 

Disaboomers: what do you think? Should city parking for people with disabilities be free or discounted?  Should the rule apply equally to all people with disabilities, or only those who have trouble putting coins in a parking meter?

 

RelatedBoston Police Headquarters a Hotbed of Handicapped Parking Violations

 

Photo credit: quarsan

 

575 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • squabwithfibro wrote on Jun 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM
    I just read this in the newspaper yesterday. I found it interesting that the person abolishing free parking for disabled employees is a wheelchair user himself. Hmmmmm......so he gets a break because he qualifies for his criteria, but say someone who can't walk long distances due to heart or breathing problems doesn't. Nice to be able to stack the deck in his own favor, huh? The bottom line.....it all comes back to $$ doesn't it? It's been a nice perk for those who were able to use it. I guess the guy who changed it still will...............I hope he is willing to pick up the guy who collapses with a heart attack!
  • MikeDangel wrote on Jun 8, 2009 at 10:25 PM
    Watch tourism in St. Louis drop big time and makes no sense.
  • squabwithfibro wrote on Jun 10, 2009 at 1:52 AM
    The article I read in the St. Louis Post Dispatch said that employees needed to obtain an additional sticker to be eligible for this benefit. I would hope that the end of a St. Louis employee benefit would affect tourism in St. Louis. This affects only those workers who typically have to pay for their parking to work downtown. How could that affect tourism?
  • Abe Munder, the Wheeled Wonder wrote on Jun 15, 2009 at 12:47 PM
    Good item, D. P., good debate. From the outside (not knowing the particulars of the measure), any impediment to access is bad. It's hard enough getting disabled folks downtown. As for Neuberger's disability, many big-city disability administrative offices are headed by an individual with a disability, but don't let that fool you: they get sat on like everybody else and will advocate or stymie as their higher-ups see fit. Don't get me wrong, some may be gems, and there's good reason they were promoted there. But others... well, think of Michelle Malkin and the great notoriety she enjoys as a female Filipino-American who blusters wildly on issues tinged by racial sensitivities, i.e., immigration, abduction and torture of foreign nationals, minority issues, etc.