Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Special Needs Student Was Regularly Tied to Fence by Bus Monitors at Arizona High School

Posted: 5/29/2009 at 03:29 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Chain Link FenceFive Tuscon Unified School District employees have been put on notice after a photograph of a special needs student restrained to a fence by his backpack surfaced, sparking an investigation. The investigation revealed that the student was routinely tied to the fence to keep him from "falling over or wandering away" while waiting for an escort after being dropped off at school.

 

"I would never intentionally do anything to a student that would give him discomfort or embarrass [the student] in any way," bus monitor Thomas Giacoma wrote in a letter to district officials. He also noted that he'd used the fence to restrain the student for most of a school year, without complaints from teachers, students, or his supervisors. When he did receive a complaint from a furious teacher in March, Giacoma says he stopped the restraint.

 

However, disability advocates disagree with Giacoma, and say that restraining a student to a fence was clearly both inappropriate and humiliating. 

 

"The fundamental question to ask is, 'Do you want to be attached to the fence, with no means of escape?' And if the answer is no, then we don't have the right to do that to anybody else - and especially for someone who can't advocate for themselves," said Northern Arizona University professor Dan Davidson, who holds a doctorate in behavioral disabilities and trains teachers who work with students with disabilities.

 

The five employees involved in the inappropriate restraint received letters of direction for the incident, and Giacoma received a verbal warning. The letters of direction signify that disciplinary action may be taken if a problem continues.

 

What do you think? Should the employees be disciplined, or are the letters of direction enough? What should they have done instead to ensure the student's safety between when he was dropped off by the bus and when someone arrived to escort him to his classroom?

 

1,178 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • afo49guy wrote on May 29, 2009 at 5:52 PM
    I think they should be prosecuted, not merely disciplined ! I`m sure they violated some law or other . Remimder that things haven`t changed all that much from the bad, old days. In 2000 something , Vermont Teddy bear featured a bear in a straightjackes with the saying "Crazy about You" for Valentines day. I suspect the expletive deleted(by ollie) that dreamed that one up NEVER SAW SOMEONE THEY CARED DEEPLY ABOUT ,WRESTLED INTO A STRAIGHT JACKET AND HAULED OFF LIKE A PIECE OF GARBAGE TO A "PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL"! Grrr.Prison would have been more accurate name for that hellhole! If they had, they might have been aware of waht a horror that thing represented and how many lives were blighted by that kind of thing. If they had seen it, AND STILL CAME UP WITH THAT, then hell must be waiting for them for they sold their soul to the devil. forgive rant, this is a subject that gets ollie very upset!
  • Tania wrote on May 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM
    I agree with Ollie. Prosecution is the most appropriate course of action. A 'letter of direction' is merely a slap on the wrist. There is nothing to really deter the employees from doing this again. Frankly, these employees should lose their jobs in addition to prosecution. Perhaps then, other people will see that such maltreatment will not be tolerated. If they are prosecuted, here is a suggestion for their punishments: tie them to a fence as they did with the student to see if they like it.
  • jamie wrote on Jun 5, 2009 at 1:52 AM
    All that the received was a "Letter of Direction" and one received a verbal warning??? What is wrong with that school district???? Why were they not fired from their jobs immediately and reported as abuse to a minor to the police??? Looks like "our" society takes another step backward.
  • Disabled Politico wrote on Jun 5, 2009 at 5:55 PM
    A Newhall, CA man has been arrested for allegedly throwing a metal bolt at participants in the Special
  • Disabled Politico wrote on Jun 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM
    School district officials in Detroit are investigating claims that a principal ordered a special education
  • James Saunders wrote on Aug 5, 2009 at 7:52 AM
    'Do you want to be attached to the fence, with no means of escape?' The points that need to be researched are: 1. Was he restrained safely? 2. Could he comprehend "embarrassment?" If the answer to the first question is "No", then absolutely, positively something should be done. However, if the answer is "yes" and the answer to the second question is "no", then nothing inappropriate happened here. Professor Dan Davidson is using an argument of pathos, however, if the mental ability of the boy couldn't comprehend him being embarrassed in the situation, then that's not an argument. I want the right to vote, but I don't believe that animals, or children, who cannot comprehend voting, should be allowed to vote, because it is beyond their mentality and is not particularly helpful to the needs of the individual or the function of participation. So the idea of "Would YOU like to be tied to a fence?" is a underhanded blow at what needs to be handled logically. Now, what we must take into account is what they boy can understand, which, working with special needs children for many years, that can be a lot more than the average person may think. If he does understand humiliation, then fine. But if not, then look at what was put at risk in relation to what he DOES understands: He understands pain/suffering, so was pain/suffering inflicted upon him? We should always do this for all living things, however, for some reason, because animals have a lower capacity of thought than we do, it allows us to ignore the glaring similarities of sentience and the ability to feel pain as we do. This is what delegitimizes animal abuse and the meat industry, as well as harming children, special needs individuals... it's what they can understand and feel we must worry about, now matter what else is coupled with it.
  • James Saunders wrote on Aug 5, 2009 at 7:53 AM
    'Do you want to be attached to the fence, with no means of escape?' The points that need to be researched are: 1. Was he restrained safely? 2. Could he comprehend "embarrassment?" If the answer to the first question is "No", then absolutely, positively something should be done. However, if the answer is "yes" and the answer to the second question is "no", then nothing inappropriate happened here. Professor Dan Davidson is using an argument of pathos, however, if the mental ability of the boy couldn't comprehend him being embarrassed in the situation, then that's not an argument. I want the right to vote, but I don't believe that animals, or children, who cannot comprehend voting, should be allowed to vote, because it is beyond their mentality and is not particularly helpful to the needs of the individual or the function of participation. So the idea of "Would YOU like to be tied to a fence?" is a underhanded blow at what needs to be handled logically. Now, what we must take into account is what they boy can understand, which, working with special needs children for many years, that can be a lot more than the average person may think. If he does understand humiliation, then fine. But if not, then look at what was put at risk in relation to what he DOES understands: He understands pain/suffering, so was pain/suffering inflicted upon him? We should always do this for all living things, however, for some reason, because animals have a lower capacity of thought than we do, it allows us to ignore the glaring similarities of sentience and the ability to feel pain as we do. This is what delegitimizes animal abuse and the meat industry, as well as harming children, special needs individuals... it's what they can understand and feel we must worry about, now matter what else is coupled with it.