Disabled Politico
Disabled Politico
NotSet
Single

Dutch Parliament to Consider Forcing "Unfit Mothers" to Take Contraception

Posted: 11/6/2008 at 05:37 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Birth Control PillsWomen in the Netherlands deemed "unfit mothers" may soon be forced to take contraception, if a draft bill currently before the Dutch parliament is passed. The bill "targets women who have been the subject of judicial intervention due to their bad parenting," says its author, a member of the Netherlands' socialist Labour Party.

 

Under the proposed legislation, a woman judged unfit who refuses to take contraception and becomes pregnant would have her child taken away at birth. The infant then would be placed in a foster home.

 

While it's certain that such a measure could potentially prevent convicted child abusers from conceiving and abusing more children, many questions have been raised about the draft bill's potential impact on human rights in the Netherlands.

 

Disabled mothers already face a worldwide uphill battle for the right to bear children. Earlier this year, "K.E.J.," a woman with developmental disabilities, was taken to court by her own aunt, who wanted K.E.J. to be sterilized against her will. K.E.J. won her court battle. But would a woman with similar disabilities be judged unfit under the proposed Dutch system? What about a woman who could not care for a child due to a mental illness like post-partum depression, but who has entered a treatment program and wants to try again?

 

The bill does not appear to include any prohibitions against discrimination based on disability, except that parents who have not yet raised a child and been judged unfit based on the way in which they parented that child would not be affected. Therefore, women would not be put on court-ordered contraception before having their first child.

 

The draft bill, if passed, could also negatively impact women's rights in the Netherlands. It does not include any provision that would place similar restrictions on the reproductive rights of fathers.

 

What do you think? Should the Dutch state be able to force women who have abused or neglected previous children to take contraception? Do you think the proposed legislation would be used as a Eugenic measure to prevent women with disabilities from having children?

 

If you found this post interesting, you might also be interested in reading about a Roma woman recently denied compensation for her forced sterilization.

 

Photograph by Anga, used under Creative Commons license.

38,295 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Bob wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:16 PM
    Oh wow, if only this could be passed in AMERICA.
  • Kevin wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:26 PM
    You're next, America. Here's the first candidate: www.filthyrichmond.com
  • Trench Wolfhound wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:34 PM
    You ask me, it's far too lenient a step, and something that should be taken even further than just the Netherlands. You have to get a license to own a weapon, drive a car, fly a plane, etc. But, to bring life into the world? Anyone can do it! I think everyone should be sterelized until they're able to prove their ability (psychologically and socially) to raise a child. You have no idea how many problems this could potentially solve. Like I said, I don't think this step is near severe enough. And don't talk to me about 'human rights'. If you're incapable of being able to drive well, you won't be able to drive a car. So, why on earth should you be allowed to raise a child if you can't do that properly? You ask me, being able to properly raise a child is a LOT more important.
  • Al wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:52 PM
    I for one applaud the measure. we need government worldwide to step up and follow suit. unfortunately, population wise, we are about 7 Billion too many in the world. The answer for every Crisis Global or otherwise, is simplay that there are too many people.
  • Steve Nordquist wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:57 PM
    This is so decent! It makes so much sense for courts to review a person's chances for having a decent parental home; of course they should pass this. You might ask contrarily if people disabled past sensibility should birth and kill children in their own pathological way for some reason or preference.
  • Fred Monk wrote on Nov 6, 2008 at 11:58 PM
    Talk about getting rid of welfare. What would all our black/white trash support themselves with ? Obama's not going to go for that. Do you think ? FUNNY, but hopeful for the USA.
  • Craig wrote on Nov 7, 2008 at 12:06 AM
    As a survivor of parental abuse it doesn't matter to me what the parent's ability status is, if they are abusive, they deserve to lose their children and be prevented from bringing more into the world. The abuse of children is a generational thing in many cases, and that cycle of abuse has to be ended.
  • bafflez wrote on Nov 7, 2008 at 12:17 AM
    If only this was was passed in the USA before Sarah Palin bred.
  • Ilia Shrago wrote on Nov 7, 2008 at 12:17 AM
    Don't sterilize--pay for abortions instead. A single payment of $500 or an option of a trip to Hawaii for everyone who is willing to have an abortion--and suddenly the number of abused and unwanted children would drop. People who value money or leisure more than their child would not have that child, and after enough abortions the body loses the ability to maintain pregnancy in any case. The children who would be born would be the ones who were wanted, loved and expected by their parents.
  • Ohcomeon wrote on Nov 7, 2008 at 12:18 AM
    Sure, take away a human right. I mean, if women aren't allowed to abort then they should be forced to do other things to their body without their consent. We're all just baby factories anyway. Are we even really human to be allowed to have such biological and innate privileges? Some Dutch people may think so. What are they doing to stop dudes from knocking up and leaving behind a trail of baby-mommas? Oh, that's right, a man's virility can be covered by insurance in the U.S. How novel.