Medicare announced on October 1, 2008, that it would no longer pay hospitals for "reasonably preventable" conditions including severe bedsores and infections caused by catheters. Disability activist Steve Gold approves of this change, but wonders why nursing homes causing the same conditions still receive Medicaid dollars.
In 2007, 91% of nursing homes surveyed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were cited for at least one deficiency. 17% of nursing homes received citations for deficiencies causing "actual harm or immediate jeopardy." 19.1% of nursing facilities received deficiencies for having residents with avoidable pressure sores. Other common deficencies included failing to prevent incontinence, using physical restraints on patients for non-medical reasons, and failing to provide residents an environment "free of accident hazards." Overall, deficiencies rose by 10% from 81% in 1998.
Steve Gold writes that, when preventable injuries occur, "Hospitals lose Medicare funds, (but) nursing facilities barely and rarely get their fingers slapped and continue to receive Medicaid funds." According to Gold, rising numbers of deficiencies indicate that citations don't motivate nursing facilities to improve.
What do you think? Should Medicaid stop paying nursing facilities when the same "reasonably preventable" conditions occur for which Medicare will no longer pay hospitals, or should the current system of citations for deficiencies stand?
Photo of nursing facility patient Dorice taken by LindaButterfly, used under Creative Commons license.