Deaf Mom
Deaf Mom
Chicagoland
Female
Married

IL Budget Cuts Hurt Those Who Need It Most

Posted: 6/16/2009 at 08:42 AM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

A friend of mine called me yesterday with some scary news--she wasn't sure if she was going to still have her social services job this summer.  The Illinois government is planning huge budget cuts that will affect nearly every social service job that receives state funds.  Some centers fear that if the budget cuts take hold as planned, they will face closure.

My friend has a salary that is a pittance for the hours that she puts in and the value that she brings to her job. Working in a non-profit environment is always an exercise in breath-holding-- the budget dance gets played out every year. Fundraising is a constant thing.  Doing the maximum with the minimum is a way of life.   This isn't the first time that Illinois has done the budget cut dance, but there's a real fear that the music really is going to end. 

Illinois is nearly two billion in the hole.

That's right.  Two billion dollars short of the budgeted amount.

Protests are being organized today, letters, calls, faxes and emails are being sent out.  Surely there has to be some pork in the budget that could be cut out?  Why are we cutting out social services jobs that pay so little to begin with?  Why can't we cut the fat from the top somewhere?  After all, my hubby took a week off without pay to save some jobs where he works.  Why can't we do the same with the top heavy people in Illinois?

Heck,, have them all take a month off spread out over the year-- I bet that alone could make a dent.  Those making over $100,000 a year can well afford a pay cut.  Those making $28,000 a year can't.

1,152 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • JFLMad wrote on Jun 16, 2009 at 10:34
    That would be a HUGE blow to us if they decide to close ISD and ISVI. ISD is our 2nd home and we all had many cherish memories while being student there.
  • Lori Taylor wrote on Jun 17, 2009 at 5:47 AM
    We foster/adopt kids with special needs. As part of the economy downfall my husband was laid off 2 weeks ago. His field has been in an incline for 5 years and we've been greatly affected financially. On top of this we learned the proposed budget is to cut adoption subsidy by 30%-50%. This will financially ruin us and finally put us under. What will happen to us, a family of six, with 2 special needs kids? What about all the foster kids out there that will be returned to agencies because they can't afford to keep the kids? The agencies that will also be cut by 30%-50%. These agencies where caseloads will go from 20 to 50 kids per worker? What about all the private contracts by the state already having been terminated effective July 1? Our daughter, who has faced gross neglect and abuse, will loose her therapist of many years. What about her and others like her that are having the rug pulled out from under them? Where will they go for mental health. Certainly not Medicaid. I'm normally a heavy sleeper, yet, here I am at 6:00 a.m. on the computer searching for the past hour. Our country needs serious help. We need to stop cutting services and funding for programs that are desperately needed and get rid of the waste in government. I'm afraid the cancer is too quickly metastasising to be able to catch up. I'm very worried. Lori Taylor 277 Seneca Way Bolingbrook, IL 60440 630-226-9055
  • squabwithfibro wrote on Jun 23, 2009 at 11:15 AM
    I heard on the news earlier today that Illinois is considering proposing an emergency income tax increase. Your solution seems sensible.....to cut the fat at the top!
  • Heidi wrote on Jun 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM
    I agree that foster funds should not be cut. I do not agree that adopted children should get a subsidy (from $4-700 per month depending on age), BUT special needs should be paid. Once a child is adopted, has no special needs, why am I paying for a subsidy? That's just silly. Perfectly healthy children being adopted into happy homes by parents looking to have children & we pay them child support. Everything should be case by case so these needy children & needy families that want to help with this case load of children can be helped. Not so adoptive parents that make over 80 grand can get vacation money & the state budget goes to heck. Give it to those that need it. CASE BY CASE!
  • Heidi wrote on Jun 30, 2009 at 9:39 AM
    I agree that foster funds should not be cut. I do not agree that adopted children should get a subsidy (from $4-700 per month depending on age), BUT special needs should be paid. Once a child is adopted, has no special needs, why am I paying for a subsidy? That's just silly. Perfectly healthy children being adopted into happy homes by parents looking to have children & we pay them child support. Everything should be case by case so these needy children & needy families that want to help with this case load of children can be helped. Not so adoptive parents that make over 80 grand can get vacation money & the state budget goes to heck. Give it to those that need it. CASE BY CASE!
  • razu345 wrote on Jul 12, 2009 at 11:01
    thanks for sharing with nice blog. excellent your writing.