Alexa
Alexa
Female
InARelationship

Supercrips and Pollyanna

Posted: 8/29/2008 at 03:06 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

I was writing a post, and I believe it got lost. Bad Disaboom server, no cookie! :)

My post was about, as so many have been before, disability in popular media. I wrote here before about Tropic Thunder and Million Dollar Baby, two movies I have no qualms about critiquing. But what happens when you're the person with the disability and you liked the movie or book that portrays us in a less than perfect way? I don't feel I can be completely honest unless I talk about that too. I'm not a walking (or a rolling, for that matter) political statement, guns blazing against every stereotype. I'm a person.

When I was a kid, I loved the book Pollyanna. Reading the last letter, the sentence "I can -- I can -- I can walk!" moved me to tears and moved me for days. I remember feeling sure it especially moved me because I have a disability that affects my legs. And it still makes me smile today, as I've learned to walk after not being able to before, and yes, it's a good feeling. (Though the smile comes with a smirk -- I've had a LOT of fun on wheels, and it's weird and creepy the way walking is supposedly so much more conducive to happiness than zipping along with the power of envy-inducing beefy arms.)

Part of it, I'm sure, is just that stpries like those are designed to pull on the heartstrings. Supercrip stereotypes aside, many people just plain like stories about people struggling to achieve their goals and finally managing it. I was a sentimental kid who didn't yet have any idea that disability is so often presented that way that it's a damaging cliche.

But part of it is more personal, and more relevant to disability issues, than that. It's wish fulfillment. I had doctors and therapists that did things that hurt, that never really bothered to spend much time cheering me on, or telling me that they understood my frustrations, or that they were proud of me. I experienced abusive treatment, and saw far more of it happen to other kids with disabilities.

Pollyanna, on the other hand, had a whole neighborhood of people who loved her, waiting with bated breath to know if she was all right. She had a rich aunt who, though miserly for most of the book, had been awakened to kindness and was prepared to cover every cent of the expenses for Pollyanna's rehabiliation. She had a young, cutting-edge doctor who loved and valued her and would stop at nothing to get her the best care from the wisest specialists, even ones many miles away in the big city.

While many of us PWD have people that love us and that work tirelessly for our care, very few of us have quite what Pollyanna did. That's perfect and loving care, care without bitterness or anger. Care without worries about the bills. Care without ever seeing those who love us wonder if we're irreparably broken. I think part of what made me cry so hard and feel so good wasn't just the adorable supercrip, but the fantasy of everything going right. Of having everything we need. Of not being devalued.

And that's why, although supercripping does annoy and worry me, however politicized I am I've never felt quite comfortable coming out full bore against it. I think sometimes we need those syrupy, simplistic fantasies. Not just the nondisabled people, who need an inspiring story to make them feel good and assuage their guilt ot fear of us, but some of us too, actually, who sometimes just want a story where we're cared for that much.

So what's the solution? I don't know. I do think there need to be, right up alongside the supercrip stories, stories where we're ordinary. Where we fail. Where people who don't know us come to see that we can't do it all ourselves. Or even just where we're regular, not special, not solely marked by the chair or the crutch or the stutter or the 248 toothpicks fallen on the ground.

Still, I don't know that it's right to get up in arms about generally positive portrayals either. Of course it's worth it to point out what's bad about those portrayals: that Pollyanna wouldn't have been unable to have adventures if she'd been on wheels (hello, she had working arms!), and that while learning to walk again is tough work and pride in doing so is justified, a person's quality of life should never be measured by whether she walks or rolls.

But sometimes a good story is just a good story. Sometimes a story can be good and problematic at the same time. People are allowed to be moved or touched by problematic things.

172 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Vicki wrote on Aug 31, 2008 at 5:29 PM
    As a person with a Pollyanna Attitude, I will say you said it well. Of course the media world likes happy endings - they have found the to be profitable - but there are many flavors of happy endings. You know if Pollyanna could never walk she would still find something good about the situation. She is, after all, Pollyanna. I would like to see or read stories without the fantasy happy ending, too. That doesn't mean the ending is not happy, just that the fantasy miracle doesn't have to be the only one.
  • Alexa wrote on Aug 31, 2008 at 5:49 PM
    I agree totally, Vicki. I think there can be lots of different representations that make sense and work.